WHEEL WORKING SYSTEM IN A TEAM: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DIFFERENT PERSONNEL IN A MARINE PROJECT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v4i35.222093Keywords:
crewing company, project, management of the project team, model groups, ship’s crewAbstract
In the article the models of management of the project team are considered, they are most difficult to formalize in the fields of knowledge in project management. The study presents economic and mathematical models for managing the project team for threshold collective behavior, for example, the crew of a sea vessel. When implementing specific projects, the experience of leadership and management of a small team often remains at the level of intuition, which leads to the individualization of knowledge and prevents the effective use of the management potential of the team. In the science of management, there are methods of managing personnel, are considered separately, without taking into account the mutual influence of psychological processes, does not allow to form a single, multifactor management concept for a small team in the project. And even more so in the development of project team management, the impact of project implementation conditions on the choice of management methods for the project team is rather poorly taken into account, requires the leader of the psychologist’s experience or significantly reduces the manageability of the project team. This method, unlike the existing ones, includes the team competence radial diagram analysis based on the «balance wheel» principle of a professional team coherence. Input data are professional testing and expert evaluation results (with the involvement of specialists and experts of appropriate qualification). Building and analysis of competence wheel diagrams allow to visualize the compatibility of professional knowledge and skills of all team members together to identify team and personal lack of knowledge and risks of project implementation. As a result, the decision-making person obtains knowledge deviation values, that can help him to make decisions for competence risks elimination. The complexity and multifactoriness of the choice of management methods for the project team, and sometimes the need for managers in direct recommendations for the management of the project team. The practical value of the obtained results lies in the enrichment of the methodology of the researched problems, which is useful for scientists, the possibility to use in business design of crewing companies.
References
Bilan, Yu., Nitsenko, V., Ushkarenko, I., Chmut, A., & Sharapa, O. (2017). Outsourcing in international economic relations. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 13 (3), 175—185. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2017.13-3.14.
Boyko, V., Rudnichenko, N., Kramskoy, S., Hrechukha, Ye., & Shibaeva, N. (2016). Concept Implementation of Decision Support Software for the Risk Management of Complex Technical System. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 255—269. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45991-2_17.
Kucherenko, V. R., Andreichenko, A. V., Zakharchenko, O. V., Markitan, O. S., Horbachenko, S. A., Nitsenko, V. S., & Parkhomenko, L. A. (2013). Upravlinnia proektamy v pidpryiemnytskykh strukturakh [Project management in business structure]. Odesa: Vyd-vo TOV «Leradruk» [in Ukrainian].
Kramskyi, S. O., Кudlai, І. V., & Tsukanov, O. Yu. (2020). Rol liudskoho faktora v pidvyshchenni ekonomichnoi bezpeky sudnoplavstva [The role of the human factor in improving the economic security of navigation]. Rynkova ekonomika: suchasna teoriia i praktyka upravlinnia — Market economy: modern theory and practice of management, 2 (45), 249—267 [in Ukrainian].
Cherepakha, H. S. (2006). Produktno-envaironmentalnyi pidkhid do upravlinnia komandoiu proektu [Product-environmental approach to project team management]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv: KNUBA [in Ukrainian].
Nitsenko, V., Mukoviz, V., & Sharapa, O. (2017). Accounting of transaction expenses of economic entities. Scientific Bulletin of Polissia, 4 (12), 2, 71—78. https://doi.org/10.25140/2410-9576-2017-2-4(12)-71-78.
Wysmułek, J., Hełdak, M., & Kucher, A. (2020). The analysis of green areas’ accessibility in comparison with statistical data in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124492.
Zakharchenko, O. V., Bakulich, O. O., Potapenko, T. P., Voloshenko, M. O., & Kharuta, V. S. (2020). Fundamentals of the System Simulation Methodology «Person-Machine» in Project and Program Management. International Journal of Management, 11 (3), 133—142. https://doi.org/10.18524/2413-9998.2020.2(45).201433.
Margerison, C. J. (2002). Team Leadership: A guide to success with team management systems. Cengage Learning (EMEA).
Bogachevska, I., & Alieksieieva, K. (2020). The Techno-Humanitarian Balance and Modernity. Philosophy and Cosmology, 25, 78—87. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/25/7.
Swiss national competence baseline ver. 4.1. (2010). Glattbrugg, Swiss: VZPM.
Andriushchenko, K., Buriachenko, A., Rozhko, O., Lavruk, O., Skok, P., Hlushchenko, Y., Muzychka, Y., Slavina, N., Buchynska, O., & Kondarevych, V. (2020). Peculiarities of sustainable development of enterprises in the context of digital transformation. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7 (3), 2255—2270. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(53).
Bushuyev, S., & Wagner, R. (2014). IPMA Delta and IPMA Organizational Competence Baseline: New approaches in the field of project management maturity. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7 (2), 302—310.
Nitsenko, V., Mardani, A., Kuksa, I., & Sudarkina, L. (2018). Additional opportunities of systematization the marketing research for resource conservation practice. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 40 (3), 361—368. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2018.34.
Nguyen, N. T. (2020). Marine Culture of Northeast Vietnam: Approaching from the Theory of Culture Ecology. Future Human Image, 13, 66—75. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/13/7.
Muravetskyi, S. A. & Kramskyi, S. O. (2016). Planuvannia protsesiv zabezpechennia yakosti u velykykh ta heohrafichno rozpodilenykh hibrydnykh IT-proektakh [Planning of quality assurance processes in large and geographically distributed hybrid IT-projects]. Visnyk NTU «KhPI» — Bulletin of NTU «KhPI», 1 (1173), 106—109. https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-3000.2016.1173.21 [in Ukrainian].
Zakharchenko, O. V., Bedrii, D. I., Bileha, O. V., & Savina, O. Y. (2020). Crewing of sea vessels taking into account project risks and technical condition of ship equipment. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 9, 130—140. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2020.09.13.
Kramskyi, S. O., & Rudnichenko, M. D. (2017). Kontseptualna model upravlinnia liudskym kapitalom u vyrobnychii
IT-orhanizatsii na platformi nechitkykh mnozhyn [Conceptual model of human capital management in a production
IT-organization on the platform of fuzzy sets]. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system — Management of Complex Systems Development, 32, 32—41 [in Ukrainian].
Zakharchenko, O. V., Odintsov, O. M., Kolodynskyi, S. B., Golubkova, I. A., & Travin, V. V. (2019). Analysis of approaches to forming teams in project management on the example of marine ship crew. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 4 (31), 173—183. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v4i31.190829.
Piliaiev, I. (2019). The Value Dichotomy Curse of Ukraine’s Modernization: to Break, or not to Be. Ukrainian Policymaker, 5, 68—76. https://doi.org/10.29202/up/5/8.
Soroka, L., & Kurkova, K. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Space Technologies: Legal, Ethical and Technological Issues. Advanced Space Law, 3, 131—139. https://doi.org/10.29202/asl/2019/3/11.
Nikolskyi, V. V., & Kramskyi, S. O. (2019). Kontseptualni osnovy upravlinnia portfeliamy proiektiv i prohram na prykladi morskoi industrii [Conceptual foundations of portfolio management of projects and programs on the example of the maritime industry]. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system — Management of Complex Systems Development, 39, 25—31. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11340635.v1 [in Ukrainian].
Osaulenko, O., Yatsenko, О., Reznikova, N., Rusak, D., & Nitsenko, V. (2020). The Productive Capacity of Countries Through the Prism of Sustainable Development Goals: Challenges to International Economic Security and to Competitiveness. Financial and credit activity problems of theory and practice, 2 (33), 492—499. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v2i33.207214.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 S. Kramskyі, V. Danchuk, V. Alkema, A. Sevostianova, O. Bakulich
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors of research articles published in the Collection agree to the following terms:
- authors reserve the right to his authorship of scientific articles and broadcast journal right of first publication of scientific articles licensed under CC Attribution (Creative Commons Attribution License), which allows others to freely distribute the published scientific article referring to the original authors of the article and the first publication of the article in Research Works’ Collection on "Finance and credit activity: problems of theory and practice";
- authors have the right to enter a separate agreement concerning additional exclusive distribution of the article in the form it was published in the journal (for example, to post the research in an electronic storage of the establishment or publish as a part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the article in the Collection.
